Posts: 411
Threads: 76
Thanks Received: 500 in 285 posts
Thanks Given: 1,077
Joined: 19 October 17
04 January 18, 03:44
I have been using Malwarebytes since the program was released, and do have a lifetime license for the same. Of late, I have been noticing that the program has become very aggressive when it comes to detecting PUPs/PUAs (Potentially Unwanted Programs/Applications).
A hyper scan on my PC today detected, 30 infections. One of those was the icon for Ashampoo deals (yes it was an icon

), and the rest were components related to WinZip Smart Monitor. Now, I got Winzip for free when I bought another application from Corel, and I'm using the program almost everyday instead of WinRAR.
Have you noticed similar annoyances with Malwarebytes?
Should I downgrade to version 2, will that help?
The following 1 user says Thank You to ashwin for this post:1 user says Thank You to ashwin for this post
• grr
Posts: 715
Threads: 521
Thanks Received: 591 in 404 posts
Thanks Given: 1,398
Joined: 19 October 17
version 1.7 was the last best.
Did you report to MBAM on false PUPs?
The following 1 user says Thank You to grr for this post:1 user says Thank You to grr for this post
• ashwin
Posts: 411
Threads: 76
Thanks Received: 500 in 285 posts
Thanks Given: 1,077
Joined: 19 October 17
(04 January 18, 16:56)grr Wrote: version 1.7 was the last best.
Did you report to MBAM on false PUPs?
No. I didn't, because I read their stand on PUPs. It is not good.
Posts: 18
Threads: 2
Thanks Received: 32 in 15 posts
Thanks Given: 7
Joined: 15 December 17
Malwarebytes was always an aggressive anti-malware or cleaning tool. Its web protection is aggressive too.
Most people use MBAM as an on-demand tool. When scanning and cleaning the system, always check the detected objects or files. Quite a few people report no internet, etc issues after cleaning the system with MBAM.
The following 1 user says Thank You to yashkhan for this post:1 user says Thank You to yashkhan for this post
• grr