AMD Brings Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 5 3500X To Life
#1
Information 
Quote:
[Image: fdsv_575px.png]

Seemingly always with AMD’s product portfolio, there is a persistent drip of new products being inserted into the product stack throughout the lifetime of a given generation of hardware. Aside from the five Ryzen 3000 series processors launched back in July, we are expecting a new 16-core flagship on top of that list come in November. Until then, AMD has inserted two new processors: one for worldwide consumption, and another for the Chinese OEM market only.

AMD’s Zen 2 platform has been a source of major success for the company, both in its consumer form as Ryzen 3000 ‘Matisse’ parts, and its server based EPYC 7002 series ‘Rome’ hardware. Being the first x86 platform on 7nm, affording significant reductions in power, as well as going above and beyond the mainstream raw performance-per-clock from Intel, has accelerated the fortunes of AMD and pushed the company into being major players in consumer and enterprise, despite being a fraction of the size.

As with any product portfolio, the diversity of offerings is key to attaching to the various markets. Making that also align with manufacturing strategies for performance and stock levels becomes a tricky business, and throughout the life cycle of a platform, companies often launch new parts to satisfy demand. To this end, AMD is launching a lower power 12-core Ryzen 9 3900 into the world-wide market for system integrators, and a Chinese market OEM-only Ryzen 5 3500X for lower cost implementations.

The Ryzen 9 3900, in order to match its lower 65W TDP, has a lower base clock than the 3900X and a slightly lower single-core turbo frequency. There will also be a corresponding Ryzen 9 Pro 3900 CPU for business use.

For the Ryzen 5 3500X, despite sending us an email telling us about its launch, AMD hasn’t actually given any specifications on it. (Edit: AMD does have specifications on the 3500X - on the Chinese website). Other PC manufacturers have listed the Ryzen 5 3500 (non-X), so it will be interesting to see if AMD acknowledges its existence.
...
Continue Reading
[-] The following 1 user says Thank You to harlan4096 for this post:
  • silversurfer
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Welcome
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username/Email:


Password:





[-]
Recent Posts
AMD suggests it may open-source FSR 4 a...
AMD still has nothin...harlan4096 — 17:21
Intel Arc G3 Panther Lake series for han...
Intel G3 with LPDD...harlan4096 — 07:32
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Ultra 5 250K...
Intel reportedly ‘ca...harlan4096 — 11:27
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Ultra 5 250K ...
Intel’s Core Ultra...harlan4096 — 11:09
Adobe Acrobat Reader DC 2025.001.21184
Adobe Acrobat Read...harlan4096 — 10:45

[-]
Birthdays
Today's Birthdays
avatar (41)svoyaEnuct
Upcoming Birthdays
avatar (47)hapedDow
avatar (46)komriwat
avatar (38)showercurtains
avatar (49)PeterWhink
avatar (50)neuthrusBub
avatar (30)script6027529171
avatar (46)myhotseeve
avatar (46)Edwinmub
avatar (46)dimaWeami
avatar (39)TranoTymn
avatar (39)MezirLal
avatar (50)listfquoto
avatar (46)dima6sarPrave
avatar (38)Michaelaburi
avatar (46)dpascoal
avatar (51)Ronaldduh
avatar (39)legalgauch
avatar (44)Baihu
avatar (27)RaseinsLikes

[-]
Online Staff
There are no staff members currently online.

>