Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
AMD Sneaks Out The Radeon RX 5300 For Casual 1080p Gaming
#1
Information 
Quote:
[Image: vs8PGodP9FiHBMZzizK3VD-970-80.jpg.webp]

Another silent launch

It isn't the first time that we've heard about the Radeon RX 5300, but it certainly comes a surprise that it took AMD so long to finally launch it.

The Radeon RX 5300 prides itself as an entry-level graphics card that delivers outstanding gaming performance at 1080p, but it's doubtful we'll see it on our list of Best GPUs. The graphics card might be exclusive to OEMs only – the only place we've ever seen the Radeon RX 5300 is inside pre-built machines. As you would expect from a Navi-based offering, the Radeon RX 5300 supports the PCIe 4.0 interface, not that it will benefit from increased throughput since the graphics card is confined to a x8 connection.

In its interior, you'll find AMD's Navi 14 die, the same 7nm TSMC-produced silicon that supposedly lives inside the Radeon RX 5300 XT. Specification-wise, we're looking at 1,408 Stream Processors (SPs) with a game and boost clock up to 1,448 MHz and 1,645 MHz, respectively. On the memory side, the Radeon RX 5300 has to work with 3GB of 14 Gbps GDDR6 memory, communicating across a 96-bit memory bus. As a result, the memory bandwidth on the Radeon RX 5300 maxes out at 168 Gbps.

If the Radeon RX 5300's specifications look familiar to you, you're not crazy. Essentially, the Radeon RX 5300 is a cut-down version of the Radeon RX 5500 XT.

Both models share the same shader count. The main differences are the lower clock speeds, less memory and a more restricted memory interface on the Radeon RX 5300.The Radeon RX 5300 has a low power requirement. AMD rates the graphics card with a 100W TBP (total board power), suggesting that it can get away with just a single 6-pin PCIe power connector. The graphics card will be copacetic even inside systems that only have a 350W power supply.

To paint a bigger picture, AMD provided some performance charts on the Radeon RX 5300's product page where the chipmaker pitched the Navi-based graphics card against Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1650. However, AMD didn't specify exactly which variant of the GeForce GTX 1650 it used in the comparison. In case you don't recall, Nvidia has put out four different versions of the GeForce GTX 1650.

At any rate, AMD claims that the Radeon RX 5300 performs anywhere from 18.6% to 56.8% faster than the GeForce GTX 1650, depending on the game. The list of results include popular titles, such as Battlefield 5, Monster Hunter World, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds. AMD used a mix of high and ultra settings for the tests. The chipmaker didn't explicitly state the resolution, but since the Radeon RX 5300 is aimed at 1080p gaming, we expect that's the resolution used.
 
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. Assuming that the Radeon RX 5300 isn't OEM-exclusive, the graphics card should compete in the sub-$150 price range.
...
Continue Reading
[-] The following 1 user says Thank You to harlan4096 for this post:
  • silversurfer
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Welcome
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username/Email:


Password:





[-]
Recent Posts
Waterfox G6.0.12
Waterfox G6.0.12​ ...harlan4096 — 15:56
Nvidia GeForce Game Ready Driver 552.22
Nvidia GeForce Gam...harlan4096 — 15:49
GFYI [Official] VTubeGo Downloader 2004...
ENTRY #2 “Share f...jAcos — 12:00
CCleaner 6.23.11010
CCleaner 6.23.1101...harlan4096 — 09:17
Samsung intros world’s first 10.7 Gbps L...
Samsung announces ...harlan4096 — 09:14

[-]
Birthdays
Today's Birthdays
avatar (47)oapedDow
avatar (40)Sanchowogy
Upcoming Birthdays
avatar (43)wapedDow
avatar (42)techlignub
avatar (41)Stevenmam
avatar (48)onlinbah
avatar (49)steakelask
avatar (43)Termoplenka
avatar (41)bycoPaist
avatar (47)pieloKat
avatar (41)ilyagNeexy
avatar (49)donitascene
avatar (49)Toligo
avatar (36)RobertUtelt

[-]
Online Staff
There are no staff members currently online.

>