Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Windows defender or paid antivirus?
#1
I recently installed a paid antivirus, after many hours dealing with the impossibility of copying an autorun.inf (harmless) file to an external disk I discovered that the antivirus was to blame, uninstalled the antivirus, end of the problem.
Each paid antivirus has its different problems, others work badly with Adguard etc ...
my question is:
from the point of view of security is a payment antivirus really necessary?
Windows defender currently seems to have a high level of protection by matching its results with the best, according to independent laboratories that test antivirus.
It is integrated into the system and although it does not have certain superfluous characteristics that others do have, it seems to be a good option from the exclusive point of view of security.
What do you think?
If I don't need cleaners, updaters, parental controls etc.
Is Windows defender the best option?
[-] The following 4 users say Thank You to angustaver for this post:
  • dhruv2193, dinosaur07, harlan4096, Starship
Reply
#2
Welcome to GFYI Smile

If You are user with safe security habits in general, then WD of course is a great option, if You already use AdGuard desktop, then probably You don't need more...

Here You are a great tool from @AndyFul to easily make some interesting and strong tweaks/harden Your WD:

https://www.ghacks.net/2018/10/29/config...tion-tool/

If You are a more advanced user then He also has Hard_Configurator to harden Your system:

https://hard-configurator.com/faq.html
[-] The following 3 users say Thank You to harlan4096 for this post:
  • dhruv2193, dinosaur07, Starship
Reply
#3
Thank you for your response, I believe that windows defending is currently enough and you have confirmed it to me.
[-] The following 3 users say Thank You to angustaver for this post:
  • dhruv2193, dinosaur07, harlan4096
Reply
#4
I would always prefer any paid AV in the place of WD.
Never keep all the eggs in the same bag. Smile
I suggest using a light AV like Eset or Emsisoft for instance. Both are way better than WD. I don't trust fully Windows.

Idea
software enthusiast!
[-] The following 2 users say Thank You to dinosaur07 for this post:
  • dhruv2193, harlan4096
Reply
#5
I believe Windows Defender, if configured correctly, is enough now adays. Unfortunately, the performance is an issue when it comes to WD, in my case it is much heavier than many other suites. If one does not want to pay, I believe WD is the best option; it is free and it is already integrated in Windows, so less compatibility issues than third-party solutions.
[-] The following 1 user says Thank You to iAwake for this post:
  • harlan4096
Reply
#6
Windows Defender, if configured correctly, is enough now adays.

But with paid AV, you get many premium features and other things which otherwise you don't get to see in WD.

So, it is what you want !
[-] The following 1 user says Thank You to Starship for this post:
  • harlan4096
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Welcome
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username/Email:


Password:





[-]
Recent Posts
AdGuard for Mac 2.14
AdGuard for Mac 2....harlan4096 — 09:03
AdGuard VPN for Mac 2.3
AdGuard VPN for Ma...harlan4096 — 08:58
INTEL Arc Graphics 31.0.101.5444
INTEL Arc Graphics...harlan4096 — 08:56
AMD “Strix Halo” Zen5 & RDNA3.5 premium ...
AMD first ultra-hi...harlan4096 — 08:54
Malwarebytes 5.1.3.110
Malwarebytes 5.1.3...Mohammad.Poorya — 00:51

[-]
Birthdays
Today's Birthdays
avatar (42)techlignub
avatar (41)Stevenmam
avatar (48)onlinbah
Upcoming Birthdays
avatar (43)wapedDow
avatar (49)steakelask
avatar (43)Termoplenka
avatar (41)bycoPaist
avatar (47)pieloKat
avatar (41)ilyagNeexy
avatar (49)donitascene
avatar (49)Toligo

[-]
Online Staff
There are no staff members currently online.

>